18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

When it comes to choosing a reliable summer tyre, it’s essential to consider key factors including efficiency, handling, and durability. This review focuses on comparing two notable options, the Nokian WetProof and Firestone Roadhawk models.


The Nokian WetProof, manufactured in Finland, boasts an overall rating of 83%. This tyre has proven itself in many tests, consistently securing a top ten position. In Autoklub ČR's test with 19 tyres, it took the 6th spot. More notably, in an ADAC test and Autobild's massive 53-tyre review, it maintained its 6th and 5th positions respectively. The Nokian WetProof's strongest features appear to be its exterior noise reduction and wet circle cornering. Reviewers praised it for its balance, and impressive performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it was slightly undermined by its environmental impact, tread wear, and minor sustainability issues.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk achieved an overall ranking of 72% in our tests. This tyre did not fare as well as the Nokian WetProof in mutual tests; it took 11th place in both the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests out of 19 and 18 tyres respectively. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it found itself in the 13th spot among 53 tyres. Best features highlighted by reviewers include dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guiding. While it fared well on dry surfaces and showed little tyre wear, it was pulled down by its less balanced performance and weaknesses on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, if one were to make a choice between the Nokian WetProof and the Firestone Roadhawk, the WetProof seems to be a stronger contender overall, despite its minor sustainability concerns. It scores better in tests, delivers balanced performance on various surfaces, and demonstrates improved exterior noise reduction and wet cornering. The Roadhawk, while efficient and lightweight with low tyre wear, falls short in wet conditions' performance and overall balance.


Visit the manufacturer’s pages for more information on Nokian and Firestone tyres. Bear in mind that while these tyres serve as good options, a tyre model's aptitude can be subject to vehicle specifications, driving style, and road conditions.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
21
10
18
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
5.6
11.9
6.0
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
47
164
104
47
40

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet handling
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison