18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When it comes to choosing a reliable summer tyre, it’s essential to consider key factors including efficiency, handling, and durability. This review focuses on comparing two notable options, the Nokian WetProof and Firestone Roadhawk models.


The Nokian WetProof, manufactured in Finland, boasts an overall rating of 83%. This tyre has proven itself in many tests, consistently securing a top ten position. In Autoklub ČR's test with 19 tyres, it took the 6th spot. More notably, in an ADAC test and Autobild's massive 53-tyre review, it maintained its 6th and 5th positions respectively. The Nokian WetProof's strongest features appear to be its exterior noise reduction and wet circle cornering. Reviewers praised it for its balance, and impressive performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it was slightly undermined by its environmental impact, tread wear, and minor sustainability issues.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk achieved an overall ranking of 72% in our tests. This tyre did not fare as well as the Nokian WetProof in mutual tests; it took 11th place in both the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests out of 19 and 18 tyres respectively. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it found itself in the 13th spot among 53 tyres. Best features highlighted by reviewers include dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guiding. While it fared well on dry surfaces and showed little tyre wear, it was pulled down by its less balanced performance and weaknesses on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, if one were to make a choice between the Nokian WetProof and the Firestone Roadhawk, the WetProof seems to be a stronger contender overall, despite its minor sustainability concerns. It scores better in tests, delivers balanced performance on various surfaces, and demonstrates improved exterior noise reduction and wet cornering. The Roadhawk, while efficient and lightweight with low tyre wear, falls short in wet conditions' performance and overall balance.


Visit the manufacturer’s pages for more information on Nokian and Firestone tyres. Bear in mind that while these tyres serve as good options, a tyre model's aptitude can be subject to vehicle specifications, driving style, and road conditions.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
14
21
10
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.6
11.9
6.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
Available sizes
47
164
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Nokian WetProof
86%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
87%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
53%
Wet Handling
Nokian WetProof
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet Circle Cornering
Nokian WetProof
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning Cross
Nokian WetProof
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
52%
Dry Performance
Nokian WetProof
83%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Nokian WetProof
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry Handling
Nokian WetProof
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Comfort & Noise
Nokian WetProof
100%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Nokian WetProof
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Economy
Nokian WetProof
66%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Nokian WetProof
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison