18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

When it comes to choosing a reliable summer tyre, it’s essential to consider key factors including efficiency, handling, and durability. This review focuses on comparing two notable options, the Nokian WetProof and Firestone Roadhawk models.


The Nokian WetProof, manufactured in Finland, boasts an overall rating of 83%. This tyre has proven itself in many tests, consistently securing a top ten position. In Autoklub ČR's test with 19 tyres, it took the 6th spot. More notably, in an ADAC test and Autobild's massive 53-tyre review, it maintained its 6th and 5th positions respectively. The Nokian WetProof's strongest features appear to be its exterior noise reduction and wet circle cornering. Reviewers praised it for its balance, and impressive performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it was slightly undermined by its environmental impact, tread wear, and minor sustainability issues.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk achieved an overall ranking of 72% in our tests. This tyre did not fare as well as the Nokian WetProof in mutual tests; it took 11th place in both the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests out of 19 and 18 tyres respectively. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it found itself in the 13th spot among 53 tyres. Best features highlighted by reviewers include dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guiding. While it fared well on dry surfaces and showed little tyre wear, it was pulled down by its less balanced performance and weaknesses on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, if one were to make a choice between the Nokian WetProof and the Firestone Roadhawk, the WetProof seems to be a stronger contender overall, despite its minor sustainability concerns. It scores better in tests, delivers balanced performance on various surfaces, and demonstrates improved exterior noise reduction and wet cornering. The Roadhawk, while efficient and lightweight with low tyre wear, falls short in wet conditions' performance and overall balance.


Visit the manufacturer’s pages for more information on Nokian and Firestone tyres. Bear in mind that while these tyres serve as good options, a tyre model's aptitude can be subject to vehicle specifications, driving style, and road conditions.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
14
21
5
3
14
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.6
11.9
2.2
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
164
63
40
706

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Wet braking
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet side guide
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry steering response
Nokian WetProof
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Interior noise
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Price/value
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison