18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

When it comes to choosing a reliable summer tyre, it’s essential to consider key factors including efficiency, handling, and durability. This review focuses on comparing two notable options, the Nokian WetProof and Firestone Roadhawk models.


The Nokian WetProof, manufactured in Finland, boasts an overall rating of 83%. This tyre has proven itself in many tests, consistently securing a top ten position. In Autoklub ČR's test with 19 tyres, it took the 6th spot. More notably, in an ADAC test and Autobild's massive 53-tyre review, it maintained its 6th and 5th positions respectively. The Nokian WetProof's strongest features appear to be its exterior noise reduction and wet circle cornering. Reviewers praised it for its balance, and impressive performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it was slightly undermined by its environmental impact, tread wear, and minor sustainability issues.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk achieved an overall ranking of 72% in our tests. This tyre did not fare as well as the Nokian WetProof in mutual tests; it took 11th place in both the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests out of 19 and 18 tyres respectively. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it found itself in the 13th spot among 53 tyres. Best features highlighted by reviewers include dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guiding. While it fared well on dry surfaces and showed little tyre wear, it was pulled down by its less balanced performance and weaknesses on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, if one were to make a choice between the Nokian WetProof and the Firestone Roadhawk, the WetProof seems to be a stronger contender overall, despite its minor sustainability concerns. It scores better in tests, delivers balanced performance on various surfaces, and demonstrates improved exterior noise reduction and wet cornering. The Roadhawk, while efficient and lightweight with low tyre wear, falls short in wet conditions' performance and overall balance.


Visit the manufacturer’s pages for more information on Nokian and Firestone tyres. Bear in mind that while these tyres serve as good options, a tyre model's aptitude can be subject to vehicle specifications, driving style, and road conditions.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
14
21
18
10
14
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#8
Average position
5.6
11.9
6.1
6.0
13.4
Latest test
2023
2024
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
47
164
47
104
153

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet handling
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet side guide
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Interior noise
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Comfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison