18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
Wetproof SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
3
15
Best position
#5
#2
Average position
5.3
9.0
Latest test
2022
2025
Available sizes
27
225

Offroad

Offroad
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Grass traction
Nokian Wetproof SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Gravel traction
Nokian Wetproof SUV
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
78%

Wet

Wet
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Nokian Wetproof SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Wetproof SUV
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Wetproof SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison