18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
Wetproof SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
3
6
Best position
#5
#3
Average position
5.3
4.7
Latest test
2022
2026
Available sizes
27
146

Wet

Wet
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Nokian Wetproof SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Wetproof SUV
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Offroad

Offroad
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Nokian Wetproof SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry braking
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison