18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WeatherProof vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
WeatherProof
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
17
10
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
Available sizes
49
104
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian WeatherProof
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Nokian WeatherProof
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WeatherProof
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WeatherProof
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Nokian WeatherProof
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WeatherProof
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WeatherProof
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Nokian WeatherProof
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Nokian WeatherProof
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WeatherProof
82%
Snow traction
Nokian WeatherProof
86%
Snow braking
Nokian WeatherProof
90%
Snow handling
Nokian WeatherProof
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WeatherProof
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian WeatherProof
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WeatherProof
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian WeatherProof
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WeatherProof
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison