18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

The comparison at hand is between two summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. These tyres were put to the test against multiple other contenders and our findings are based on the accumulated data. Let's explore their strengths, and weakness regarding their performance.


Made in Finland, the Nokian Powerproof shows an impressive overall performance with an aggregate rating of 71%. Noteworthy is its wet braking capability making it a reliable choice for variable summer weather conditions. The tyre managed to earn the 2nd position in the Autobild test among 50 other tyres. In the ADAC test, it landed the 11th spot performing exceptionally well in terms of quietness with a diminished interior noise.


The Kumho Ecsta PS71, on the other hand, boasts a slightly higher overall rating of 72%. It is particularly known for its aquaplaning resistance, both cross and longitudinal, which was additionally recognized in the ADAC test where it bagged the 10th position. In the Autobild test, it managed the 5th position making it one of the top contenders there too.


Both of these tyres are part of the summer collection of their respective manufacturers, Nokian and Kumho. At present, neither Nokian Powerproof nor Kumho Ecsta PS71 have been replaced by newer models, making them current and relevant choices for summer tyres.


Despite their separate strengths, these tyres offer a reasonably close performance with their overall ratings only being 1% apart. While the Nokian Powerproof excels in terms of wet braking and reduced noise, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 stands out for its resistance against aquaplaning. Considering their performance in both tests, although Kumho fared better than Nokian in the ADAC test, Nokian outperformed Kumho in the Autobild.


In conclusion, if you prioritize lower noise and better wet braking performance, the Nokian Powerproof would be an ideal pick. Conversely, if stronger resistance against aquaplaning is what you seek, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 might be a better option.

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
11
15
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
7.5
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
225
64

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Offroad

Offroad
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison