18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
11
1
15
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
7.5
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
64
225

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Offroad

Offroad
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
64%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison