Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof

R17 – R20

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

11

3

5

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

7.5

3.3

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

40

60

63

34

Wet

Nokian Powerproof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Offroad

Nokian Powerproof

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Offroad

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison