Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof

R17 – R20

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Number of tests

11

3

7

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

7.5

3.3

3.7

2.4

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

40

34

137

Wet

Nokian Powerproof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

94%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

92%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Wet side guide

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

84%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

95%

Dry steering response

Nokian Powerproof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

Offroad

Nokian Powerproof

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

Sand traction

Nokian Powerproof

93%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

72%

Grass traction

Nokian Powerproof

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

85%

Handling on gravel

Nokian Powerproof

100%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

77%

Gravel traction

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

72%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

64%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

66%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Offroad

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison