18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
2
4
2
Best position
#6
#3
#1
Average position
8.0
12.0
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
111
23

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison