Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

CrossClimate 2

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3

R16

Also compare with

Cinturato All Season SF3

Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

CrossClimate 2

RADIAL ClimateActive

Number of tests

2

24

3

Best position

#6

#1

#5

Average position

8.0

2.7

7.3

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

91

151

1

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

71%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Powerproof 2

CrossClimate 2

RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison