18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
3
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
4.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
54
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison