18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Nokian Powerproof 2

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Nokian

Powerproof 2

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

10

3

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

8.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2026

2025

Available sizes

91

104

34

Wet

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison