18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
2
16
14
Best position
#6
#3
#8
Average position
8.0
5.5
13.4
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
91
153
153

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison