18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Fulda EcoControl HP2Budget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP2

7.2
R15 – R18
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
2
8
26
Best position
#6
#4
#1
Average position
8.0
12.8
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
91
30
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison