18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental SportContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

SportContact 7

10.0
R18 – R23
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
2
3
15
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
91
34
122

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison