18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
2
2
4
Best position
#6
#1
#3
Average position
8.0
1.0
12.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
23
111

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison