18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
26
10
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
2.2
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
66
104

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison