18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.2
R16 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
26
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
66
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison