Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Turanza T005

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

Turanza T005

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

2

33

15

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

8.0

4.1

9.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

91

658

225

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Powerproof 2

Turanza T005

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison