Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Turanza T005

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

Turanza T005

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

2

33

10

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

8.0

4.1

6.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

91

658

104

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Powerproof 2

Turanza T005

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison