18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#6
#8
#2
Average position
8.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
153
60

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison