18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Nokian Powerproof 2

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Nokian

Powerproof 2

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

2

14

3

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

8.0

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2026

2026

2026

Available sizes

91

153

60

Wet

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison