18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
1
Best position
#6
#8
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
13.4
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
153
34
64

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison