18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
4
1
5
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
12.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
111
64
63

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison