18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
4
1
3
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
111
64
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison