18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
6
4
23
Best position
#6
#3
#1
Average position
12.2
12.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
111
188

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
97%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison