18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
6
13
3
Best position
#6
#4
#5
Average position
12.2
6.3
7.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
111
1

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison