18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
1
10
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
1.0
6.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
53
64
104

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison