18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Nokian Line

Nokian

Line

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Nokian

Line

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

6

1

10

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

1.0

6.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

64

104

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison