Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Budget

GT

RADIAL ClimateActive

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato All Season SF3

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Line

RADIAL ClimateActive

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

6

3

10

Best position

#6

#5

#2

Average position

12.2

7.3

6.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

1

104

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Line

RADIAL ClimateActive

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison