18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
3
10
Best position
#6
#5
#2
Average position
12.2
7.3
6.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
53
1
104

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison