18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Number of tests
6
3
13
Best position
#6
#5
#4
Average position
12.2
7.3
6.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
1
111

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison