Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

15

3

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

12.2

3.3

9.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

40

225

34

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Fuel efficiency

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison