Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

3

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

12.2

3.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

40

34

40

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Fuel efficiency

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison