18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
5
1
3
Best position
#6
#1
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
2.2
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
63
64
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison