18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

The data provided below highlights a comparison between two tyres: the Nokian Line and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. Both models are made for summer use, the former in Finland and the latter in Slovenia.


Looking at the tyre tests, the Nokian Line and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance were featured in different testing categories in Autobild and ADAC tests. In the Autobild test, the Goodyear tyre notably positioned better than the Nokian tyre among 50 competitors. It secured the 5th position and even showcased its best features in 'Aquaplaning - cross'.


On the other hand, the Nokian Line secured the 14th position in the same test, which points at some advantages but also room for improvement. Similarly, in the ADAC test, the Goodyear tyre once again surpassed the Nokian tyre by securing the 4th position due to its strong 'Dry driving behavior' and 'Wet circle cornering'. The Nokian Line wasn't far behind, landing at 6th position.


With an overall rating of 43%, Goodyear's Efficient Grip Performance clearly outperforms the Nokian Line. Importantly, a newer model of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, appropriately named Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, has replaced the previous tyre, possibly offering even better functionalities and features.


In conclusion, Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance stands out thanks to its better test positions and features like strong aquaplaning resistance and exceptional dry driving behavior. While Nokian Line also shows some good capability, it may need improvement to match its competitor. Therefore, potential buyers looking for reliable summer tyres might do well to consider the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance or its updated version. But for those valuing Scandinavian quality, the Nokian Line could be a solid choice.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
16
4
18
3
3
Best position
#6
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.2
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
53
153
111
47
34
40

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison