18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

The data provided below highlights a comparison between two tyres: the Nokian Line and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. Both models are made for summer use, the former in Finland and the latter in Slovenia.


Looking at the tyre tests, the Nokian Line and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance were featured in different testing categories in Autobild and ADAC tests. In the Autobild test, the Goodyear tyre notably positioned better than the Nokian tyre among 50 competitors. It secured the 5th position and even showcased its best features in 'Aquaplaning - cross'.


On the other hand, the Nokian Line secured the 14th position in the same test, which points at some advantages but also room for improvement. Similarly, in the ADAC test, the Goodyear tyre once again surpassed the Nokian tyre by securing the 4th position due to its strong 'Dry driving behavior' and 'Wet circle cornering'. The Nokian Line wasn't far behind, landing at 6th position.


With an overall rating of 43%, Goodyear's Efficient Grip Performance clearly outperforms the Nokian Line. Importantly, a newer model of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, appropriately named Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, has replaced the previous tyre, possibly offering even better functionalities and features.


In conclusion, Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance stands out thanks to its better test positions and features like strong aquaplaning resistance and exceptional dry driving behavior. While Nokian Line also shows some good capability, it may need improvement to match its competitor. Therefore, potential buyers looking for reliable summer tyres might do well to consider the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance or its updated version. But for those valuing Scandinavian quality, the Nokian Line could be a solid choice.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
16
6
3
Best position
#6
#3
#3
#2
Average position
12.2
5.5
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
53
153
146
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison