Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Line

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

18

14

15

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

6.1

3.6

9.0

Latest test

2018

2024

2025

Available sizes

53

47

188

225

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Line

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison