Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Line

Roadhawk

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

21

1

3

Best position

#6

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

11.9

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2018

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

164

64

40

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Fuel efficiency

Nokian Line

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Line

Roadhawk

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison