18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
6
26
Best position
#6
#3
#1
Average position
12.2
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
53
146
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison