Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Line

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

6

3

2

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

12.2

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

53

34

23

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Line

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison