18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
49
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
3.2
3.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
53
213
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison