18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian LineUpper-middle
NokianNokian

Line

R14 – R17
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
14
10
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.2
3.6
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
53
188
104
40

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison