18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Nokian Line

Nokian

Line

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Nokian

Line

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

6

14

3

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

12.2

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2026

Available sizes

53

153

60

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison