Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Line

Advantage

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

6

14

23

Best position

#6

#8

#1

Average position

12.2

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

153

176

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Line

Advantage

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison