18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Nokian LineUpper-middle
NokianNokian

Line

R14 – R17
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
14
3
26
Best position
#6
#8
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
13.4
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
53
153
40
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison