18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
14
5
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
12.2
13.4
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
53
153
63

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison