18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
14
3
Best position
#6
#8
#2
Average position
12.2
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
53
153
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison