18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Dunlop Winter

Nokian Line

Nokian

Line

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Dunlop Winter

Dunlop

Winter

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Nokian

Line

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Dunlop

Winter

Number of tests

6

14

2

Best position

#6

#8

#1

Average position

12.2

13.4

1.5

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

153

65

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison