18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Nokian
WetProof
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
5
14
14
Best position
#2
#1
#8
Average position
4.2
5.6
13.4
Latest test
2017
2023
2026
Available sizes
33
47
153

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Nokian WetProof
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Nokian WetProof
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Nokian WetProof
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Nokian WetProof
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Nokian WetProof
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Nokian WetProof
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Nokian WetProof
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Nokian WetProof
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Nokian WetProof
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Nokian WetProof
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Nokian WetProof
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Nokian WetProof
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Interior noise
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Nokian WetProof
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison